What is in the compound library
The library is the reference layer behind the tracker: one entry per compound, covering supplements, peptides, hormones including testosterone and its support drugs, GLP-1 medications and the common prescriptions that people run alongside them. Each entry sets out what the compound is, the mechanism in plain language, the amount ranges that have actually been studied, how timing and food change absorption, the half-life where it is known, and the contraindications that matter enough to be worth a warning.
Entries are written to be read in under two minutes and to be honest about their limits. Where the human evidence is thin — as it is for a large share of research peptides — the entry says so rather than dressing up animal data or forum convention as clinical guidance. Where numbers are disputed, you get the range and the reason for the disagreement.
How to search it
Search matches names, synonyms and brand names, so semaglutide, Ozempic and Wegovy all land in the right place, and misspellings usually still resolve. If you would rather browse, the goal filters group entries by what people are trying to achieve — sleep, recovery, fat loss, testosterone support, cognition, joint health — and the category filters split by class when you already know whether you want a peptide or a mineral.
Every entry links straight into the app: add it to a stack with a schedule attached, run it through the interaction checker against everything else you take, or open the reconstitution calculator when it is something you mix yourself. The point of the library is not reading; it is getting a correct protocol set up quickly.
- Search by generic name, brand name or common abbreviation
- Filter by goal when you know the outcome but not the compound
- Every entry links to interactions, dosing tools and stack setup
- Sources cited inline, with the review date on the page
How entries are kept accurate
Each entry is built from labeling, published trials and pharmacology references where those exist, and marks community practice as community practice when that is all there is. Interaction claims carry the mechanism and the source, because a warning you cannot verify is a warning most people learn to dismiss.
The library is reviewed on a rolling basis and corrected in place, with the reviewed date moved when the substance of an entry changes. None of it is medical advice, and none of it is a substitute for the clinician who knows your labs — it exists so that the conversation you have with that clinician starts from accurate numbers.
How to read an entry without over-reading it
Every entry follows the same shape so you can compare two compounds without re-learning a layout. The opening line says what the compound is and what class it belongs to. The mechanism paragraph explains, in ordinary language, what it is thought to do in the body and how confident anyone should be about that. The dosing block gives studied ranges rather than a single recommended number, because the studied range is a fact and a recommendation would not be. Timing notes cover food, other compounds and time of day, and the safety block lists the interactions and conditions that would make a clinician pause.
A studied range is not a suggestion to start at the top of it. In practice most people who run into trouble did two things at once: started high and started several new compounds in the same week. Adding one item at a time, holding it for long enough to see a pattern, and writing down what you noticed is slower and works better — and it is the only way to attribute an effect to a cause when you are running six things at once.
- Same structure on every entry, so two compounds can be compared side by side
- Studied ranges and half-lives, not invented 'recommended' numbers
- Timing and food notes that change absorption in practice
- Contraindications and monitoring notes worth raising with a clinician
Where the library stops
This library describes compounds; it does not tell you which ones to take. It has no view on your labs, your prescriptions, your kidney or liver function, your pregnancy status or your history, and those are exactly the facts that decide whether something is reasonable for you. Anything that requires a prescription requires a prescriber, and the entries here are written to make that conversation shorter and better informed rather than to replace it.
We also do not sell compounds, take vendor placements, or link to sellers. That is a deliberate limitation: the moment a reference library has something to sell, its dosing advice stops being trustworthy. If an entry says the evidence is weak, no commercial pressure is pulling in the other direction.